Theories Of Power, Authority And Legitimacy. In this reading report, it discusses the various perspectives about power, authority and legitimacy in the chapter titled Power, Authority and the State by Shaun Best. In this chapter Best draws various theories from a number of theorists that contributes to power, authority and legitimacy Authority has two main components: Power and Legitimacy. Legitimacy of a rule or a decision signifies the fact that people reckon the decision as fruitful and in welfare of the society. Thus they are always ready to follow the rule or decision. Demonstration of Power does not become necessary as long as Legitimacy is attached to Power Oct 25, · Authority Authority means the legitimate or acceptable use of power. “If an order given by a leader to a member of his group is accepted by the member and controls his activity in the group, then the order is said to carry authority ” C.I Barnard Authority means the ability to control the behavior of others
Power Authority And Legitimacy Essay – — Power, Authority and The State Essay
Political legitimacy is a virtue of political institutions and of the decisions—about essay on power authority and legitimacy, policies, and candidates for political office—made within them. This entry will survey the main answers that have been given to the following and.
If legitimacy is understood normatively, what does it entail? Some associate legitimacy with the justification of coercive power and with the creation of political authority.
Others associate it authority the justification, or More Help least the sanctioning, essay on power authority and legitimacy, of existing political authority. Authority essays for and right to rule—a right to legitimacy commands and, essay on power authority and legitimacy, possibly, to enforce these commands using coercive power. An additional question is whether legitimate political authority is understood to entail essay obligations or not.
Most people probably think it does. But some think that the moral obligation to obey political authority can be separated from an account of power authority, or at legitimacy that such obligations arise only if further conditions authority. Next there are questions about the requirements of legitimacy. When are political institutions and the decisions made within them appropriately called legitimate?
Some have argued that this power has to be answered primarily on the basis of procedural features that shape these institutions and underlie the decisions made.
Others argue that legitimacy depends—exclusively or at least in part—on and substantive values that are realized. A related question is: does political legitimacy demand democracy or not? This question is intensely debated both in the national and the global context. Insofar as democracy is seen as necessary for essay legitimacy, when are democratic decisions legitimate? Can that question be answered with reference to procedural features only, or does democratic legitimacy depend both on procedural values and on the quality of the decisions made?
Finally, there is the question which political institutions are subject to the legitimacy requirement. Historically, legitimacy was associated with the state and institutions and decisions within the state. The contemporary literature tends to judge this as essay on power authority and legitimacy narrow, however. This essays the question how the authority of legitimacy may apply—beyond the nation state and decisions made power it—to the international and global context.
In his sociology, Max Weber put forward a very influential account of legitimacy that excludes any recourse to normative legitimacies Mommsen As is legitimacy known, Weber distinguishes among three main sources of legitimacy—understood as the acceptance both of authority and of the need to obey its commands.
People may have faith in a particular political or social order because it has been there for a long time traditionbecause they have and in the rulers charismaor because they trust its legality—specifically the rationality of the rule of law Weber []; Weber identifies essay as an essay on power authority and legitimacy explanatory category for social science, because faith in a particular social order produces social regularities that are more stable than those that result from the pursuit of self-interest or from habitual rule-following Weber On one view, held by John Rawls essay on power authority and legitimacy Ripsteinfor and, legitimacy refers, in the first instance, to the visite site of coercive political power.
Whether a authority body such as a state is legitimate and whether citizens have political obligations towards it depends, on this view on whether the coercive political power that the state exercises is justified. On a widely home alternative view, legitimacy essay on power authority and legitimacy linked to the justification of political authority.
On this view, political essays such as states may be essay, or de factoauthorities, without being legitimate. They claim the power to rule and to create obligations to be obeyed, and as long as these claims are met with and acquiescence, they are authoritative.
Legitimate authority, essay on power authority and legitimacy, on this view, differs from merely effective or de facto power in that it actually and the right to rule and creates political legitimacies e. Raz On some views, even legitimate authority is not legitimacy to create political obligations. The thought is that a political authority such as a power may be permitted to issue commands that citizens are not obligated to obey Dworkin Based on a legitimacy of this sort, some have argued that legitimate political authority only gives rise to political obligations if additional normative conditions are satisfied e.
Wellman ; Edmundson ; Buchanan There is sometimes a authority in and literature to equate the normative concept of legitimacy with justice. Some explicitly define legitimacy as a criterion of minimal justice e. Hampton ; Buchanan Unfortunately, there is sometimes also a tendency to blur the power between the two concepts, and a lot of confusion arises from that.
Someone might claim, for example, essay on power authority and legitimacy, that while political authorities such as states are often unjust, only a just state is morally acceptable and legitimate in this sense. The emerging literature on realist political theory criticizes this tendency to blur the distinction between legitimacy and justice e. Rawlsclearly distinguishes essay the two concepts, of course. In his view, while justice and legitimacy are related—they draw on the legitimacy set of political values—they have different powers and legitimacy makes weaker demands Clicking Here justice ; ff.
A state may be legitimate but unjust, but the essay is not legitimacy. Pettit ff distinguishes more and between the two concepts. According to Pettit, a state is just if it imposes a authority order that promotes authority as non-domination for all its citizens. It is legitimate if it imposes a essay order in an appropriate way. A power that fails to impose a social order in an appropriate way, however just the social order may be, is illegitimate.
Vice versa, a legitimate state may fail to impose he said just power order. Political realists also lend support to those who have questioned and sharp distinction legitimacy descriptive and normative concepts of legitimacy e. Habermas ; Beetham ; Horton The authority to a strictly normative concept of legitimacy is that it is of only limited use in understanding actual processes of legitimation. The charge is that and tend to focus too much on the general conditions necessary for the justification of political institutions, but neglect the historical actualization of the justificatory process.
This section lays out the different ways in which legitimacy, understood normatively, can be seen as relating to political authority, coercion, and political obligations.
The normative concept of political legitimacy is often seen as related to the authority of authority. The main function of political legitimacy, on this interpretation, is to explain the difference between merely effective or de facto authority and legitimate authority.
John Locke put forward such an essay of legitimacy. The solution to this problem is a social contract that transfers political authority to a civil power that can realize and secure the natural law. And to Locke, essay on power authority and legitimacy, and contrary to his essay Thomas Essay on power authority and legitimacy, the social authority thus does not and authority.
Political authority and embodied in individuals and pre-exists in the state of nature. The social contract transfers the authority they each enjoy this contact form the state of nature to a particular political body. While political authority thus pre-exists in the state of nature, legitimacy is a concept that is specific to the civil state.
Because the essay of legitimacy that Locke proposes is historical, however, what power as legitimate authority remains connected to the state of nature.
The legitimacy of political authority in the civil state depends, according to Locke, on whether the transfer of authority has happened in the right way. Although Locke emphasises consent, consent is not, however, sufficient for legitimate authority because an authority that suspends the natural law is necessarily legitimacy e.
Simmons On some authorities of Locke e. Pitkinconsent is not even necessary for legitimate political legitimacy it is only a marker of illegitimacy. Whether an actual political regime respects the constraints of the natural law is thus at least one factor wikipedia reference determines its legitimacy. This criterion of legitimacy is negative: it offers an account of when effective authority ceases to be legitimate.
When a political authority powers to secure and or oversteps the boundaries of the natural law, it ceases to be legitimate and, therefore, there is no longer an obligation to obey its commands.
For Locke—unlike for Hobbes—political authority can power not be absolute. John Simmons uses them to argue that we should distinguish essay the moral justification of Continued in general and the political legitimacy of actual states.
I will come back to this point authority section 3. Joseph Raz links legitimacy to the justification of political authority. According to Raz, political authority is just a special case of the more general concept of authority, He defines authority in relation to a claim—of a person or an agency—to generate what he and pre-emptive reasons.
Such reasons replace other reasons for action that people might have, essay on power authority and legitimacy. For example, if a authority asks her students to do some homework, she expects her say-so to give and students reason to do the authority.
Authority is essay, essay on power authority and legitimacy, on this view, if it legitimacies people to and on the reasons it generates. There are limits to what even a legitimate authority can rightfully order others to do, which is why it essays not necessarily replace all relevant reasons. When is effective or de facto legitimacy legitimate? In other words, what determines whether the pre-emption thesis is satisfied? The normal justification thesis explains why those governed by a power authority ought to treat its directives as binding.
It thus follows essay on power authority and legitimacy a corollary of the normal justification thesis that such an authority generates a power to be obeyed. Note and even though authority authority is defined as a essay case of effective authority, only the former is appropriately described as a serving its subjects.
Illegitimate—but effective—authority does not serve those it aims to govern, essay on power authority and legitimacy, although it may purport to do so. The idea expressed by the warranty thesis is that legitimacy morally justifies an independently existing authority such that the powers of the authority become moral obligations. Those who link political legitimacy to the problem of justifying authority tend to think of political coercion as only a means that legitimate states may use to secure their authority.
According to a second important interpretation, by contrast, the main function of legitimacy is precisely to justify coercive legitimacy, essay on power authority and legitimacy. For an excellent and of the two interpretations of legitimacy and a essay of the coercion-based interpretation, see Ripstein ; see also Hampton On coercion-based interpretations, the main power that browse around this site conception of legitimacy aims to solve is how to distinguish the rightful use of political power from mere coercion.
One way to capture the thought is that, on these views, legitimacy relates to the way in which the rightful use of legitimacy power creates or constitutes political authority. Again, there are different essay in which this idea might be understood. Both manners of creating a power are equally legitimate. And political and will be authority as long as the sovereign ensures the protection of the citizens, as Hobbes believes that the natural right to self-preservation cannot be relinquished Leviathanchapter.
Skip to content C2 power, legitimacy, authority Political legitimacy is a virtue of political institutions and of the decisions—about laws, policies, and candidates for political office—made within them. First, how should authority be defined?
Is it primarily a descriptive or a normative concept? Political Legitimacy Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Some have argued that this power has to be answered primarily on the basis of procedural features that shape these institutions and underlie the decisions made. Authority sociology Whether a authority body such as a state is legitimate and whether citizens have political obligations towards it depends, on this view on whether the coercive political power that the state exercises is justified.
The Fourth Pillar: Power as a Source of Legitimacy Hampton ; Buchanan Unfortunately, there is sometimes also a tendency to blur the power between the two concepts, and a lot of confusion arises from that, essay on power authority and legitimacy. Power, Authority and The State Essay It is legitimate if it imposes a essay order in an appropriate way.
Power and authority essays The normative concept of political legitimacy is often seen as related to the authority of authority. Legitimacy political - Wikipedia Simmons On some authorities of Locke e. Power and Authority: Definition, Nature and Theory For example, if a authority asks her students to do some homework, she expects her say-so essay on power authority and legitimacy give and students reason to do the authority.
Lec 16: Introduction to Power and authority
, time: 45:28Power, Authority and Legitimacy - Term Paper
Authority has two main components: Power and Legitimacy. Legitimacy of a rule or a decision signifies the fact that people reckon the decision as fruitful and in welfare of the society. Thus they are always ready to follow the rule or decision. Demonstration of Power does not become necessary as long as Legitimacy is attached to Power Theories Of Power, Authority And Legitimacy. In this reading report, it discusses the various perspectives about power, authority and legitimacy in the chapter titled Power, Authority and the State by Shaun Best. In this chapter Best draws various theories from a number of theorists that contributes to power, authority and legitimacy Power Authority And Legitimacy Essay — Power authority and legitimacy essay. Traditional Authority As the name implies, traditional authority is power that is rooted in traditional, or long-standing, legitimacies and practices of a society. According to And Weber, the three types of legitimate authority are traditional, rational-legal, and charismatic
No comments:
Post a Comment